Instrument overview

ALKSAlkermes plc

StockNasdaqIrelandHealth careEU retail: available

+2.1% today · +46.0% over a year

4/10 A 1–10 summary of how an instrument compares with similar ones (same sector and region) by published rules. It describes today's data; it is not a price forecast. More in the glossary → «Balanced» — higher than 47% of the instruments we score

Priced higher than most peers (P/E 114.8). No dividend.

Alkermes plc (ALKS) belongs to the Health care sector and is listed on Nasdaq; country: Ireland. Its market value is about €6.8B. Over the past 12 months the price changed by +46.0%, with an annualised volatility of 40% and a largest fall of 29%.

Balanced 4/104/10Balanced
Weights for long-horizon accumulation: more quality and trend, no dividend requirement. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →4/10
Default weights: value, quality, trend, stability and dividend safety together. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →4/10
Weights for income: dividend safety counts most; shown for dividend payers only. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →—/10

The Smart Score (1–10) describes how this instrument compares with its peers on published, rules-based measures of value, quality, trend, stability and dividend safety. It is not a forecast and not personal advice.

Compared with: Health care companies in Europe (n = 45)

Current rating first published: · last recomputed · rating log

Factor scores

How cheap the company is versus peers: earnings, cash flow, book value and sales relative to its price. More in the glossary →better than 31% of peers
Profitability, balance-sheet safety, growth and capital discipline versus peers. More in the glossary →better than 57% of peers
Price trend over the last 12 and 6 months (excluding the last month) and distance from the 52-week high. More in the glossary →better than 68% of peers
Lower price swings, lower market sensitivity (beta) and shallower drawdowns score higher. More in the glossary →better than 49% of peers

Percentiles within the peer group (100 = the best of its peers); dividend safety in points.

Main drivers

  • Gross profit growth / assets (5 y)supports the score · better than 76% of peers
  • 12-month trend (ex last month)supports the score · better than 81% of peers
  • Gross profit / assetssupports the score · better than 89% of peers

Red flags and notes

  • Caution. Net debt above 4× EBITDA or interest cover below 2×. More in the glossary → Net debt above 4× EBITDA or interest cover below 2×.

Price chart

Interactive chart by TradingView: exchange prices are delayed, crypto and currencies are live.

Key metrics

Valuation

P/E
114.8
P/B
4.2
P/S
4.6
EV/EBIT
72.1
Market cap (EUR)
€6.8B

Profitability and debt

Return on equity
3.9%
Return on invested capital
2.8%
Gross margin
84.6%
Net debt / EBITDA
4.85

Dividends

Dividend yield
0.00%
Years of dividend growth
0

Returns and risk

1 day
+2.1%
1 month
+12.7%
1 year
+46.0%
Volatility, 1 yr
40.0%
Max drawdown, 1 yr
−29.2%
Beta
0.92

Ratios from SEC filings and end-of-day prices; returns are price changes without dividends.

Similar companies

Same sector and region, closest in market value.

BLCOBausch + Lomb Corporation5/100.0%34.2%
STVNStevanato Group S.p.A.2/100.3%−24.4%
QIAQiagen N.V.9/105.5%11.6%
QGENQiagen N.V.7/100.7%5.9%
CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG1/100.0%−15.7%
FMEFresenius Medical Care AG7/103.7%−9.2%
LIVNLivaNova PLC7/100.0%49.8%
SNSmith & Nephew plc6/102.6%−18.7%

News and filings

What the marks mean
  • FactA filing (SEC EDGAR) or an exchange notice (Moscow Exchange): the issuer's or the exchange's own statement.
  • Media reportA headline from a named media outlet. We link to it and do not check it.
  • RumourUnconfirmed: the headline itself hedges (“reportedly”, “sources say”, “in talks”), names no publisher, or comes from a news aggregator or an automated republisher.

Source: Filings: U.S. SEC EDGAR. The tone is scored automatically from the headline and can be wrong.

Score changes in the last 12 months

Every published rating and change, logged when it was published (EU Market Abuse Regulation).

Show the log: 3 entries
DateEventBalancedGrowth · IncomeWarningsPrice at publication
Rating change 4/10 4 · — — Available with Invest Pro
Rating change 5 → 4/10 5 · — — Available with Invest Pro
First rating 5/10 5 · — Available with Invest Pro

Ratings are rules-based descriptions, valid until the next scoring run (about 06:20 and 21:50 UTC) and the same for every visitor.