Instrument overview

DXCMDexCom Inc

StockNasdaqUnited StatesHealth careEU retail investors: available

+2.1% today · +47.4% over a year

9/10 A 1–10 summary of how an instrument compares with similar ones (same sector and region) by published rules. It describes today's data; it is not a price forecast. More in the glossary → «Balanced» — higher than 92% of the instruments we score

Quality: among the best of its peers; priced lower than most peers. No dividend.

DexCom Inc (DXCM) belongs to the Health care sector and is listed on Nasdaq; country: United States. Its market value is about €27B. Over the past 12 months the price changed by +47.4%, with an annualised volatility of 38% and a largest fall of 23%.

Balanced 9/109/10Balanced
Weights for long-horizon accumulation: more quality and trend, no dividend requirement. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →10/10
Default weights: value, quality, trend, stability and dividend safety together. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →9/10
Weights for income: dividend safety counts most; shown for dividend payers only. These are three ways to weigh the same factors, not three properties of the instrument; Income compares within the sector, so a low yield can still score high. More in the glossary →—/10

The Smart Score (1–10) describes how this instrument compares with its peers on published, rules-based measures of value, quality, trend, stability and dividend safety. It is not a forecast and not personal advice.

Compared with: Health care companies in USA (n = 338)

Current rating first published: · last recomputed · rating log

Factor scores

How cheap the company is versus peers: earnings, cash flow, book value and sales relative to its price. More in the glossary →better than 61% of peers
Profitability, balance-sheet safety, growth and capital discipline versus peers. More in the glossary →better than 94% of peers
Price trend over the last 12 and 6 months (excluding the last month) and distance from the 52-week high. More in the glossary →better than 74% of peers
Lower price swings, lower market sensitivity (beta) and shallower drawdowns score higher. More in the glossary →better than 57% of peers

Percentiles within the peer group (100 = the best of its peers); dividend safety in points.

Main drivers

  • Share issuance (1 y)supports the score · better than 93% of peers
  • Piotroski F-scoresupports the score · better than 95% of peers
  • Return on invested capitalsupports the score · better than 94% of peers

Red flags and notes

No red flagsNone of our published warning rules is triggered right now.

Price chart

Interactive chart by TradingView: exchange prices are delayed, crypto and currencies are live.

Key metrics

Valuation

P/E
30.5
P/B
11.9
P/S
5.9
EV/EBIT
24.9
Free-cash-flow yield
3.6%
Market cap (EUR)
€27B

Profitability and debt

Return on equity
37.7%
Return on invested capital
31.2%
Gross margin
63.4%
Net debt / EBITDA
0.19

Dividends

Dividend yield
0.00%
Years without a lower dividend
0

Returns and risk

1 day
+2.1%
1 month
−3.6%
1 year
+47.4%
Volatility, 1 yr
38.0%
Max drawdown, 1 yr
−22.6%
Beta
1.12

Ratios from SEC filings and end-of-day prices; returns are price changes without dividends.

Similar companies

Same sector and region, closest in market value.

LHLabcorp Holdings9/100.8%48.6%
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services I8/100.2%52.9%
DGXQuest Diagnostics10/101.3%47.1%
RMDResMed Inc10/101.0%−5.3%
ILMNIllumina8/100.0%81.1%
ZTSZoetis7/103.2%−30.0%
CNCCentene Corporation7/100.0%82.5%
MTDMettler Toledo7/100.0%22.4%

News and filings

What the marks mean
  • FactA filing (SEC EDGAR) or an exchange notice (Moscow Exchange): the issuer's or the exchange's own statement.
  • Media reportA headline from a named media outlet. We link to it and do not check it.
  • RumourUnconfirmed: the headline itself hedges (“reportedly”, “sources say”, “in talks”), names no publisher, or comes from a news aggregator or an automated republisher.

Source: Filings: U.S. SEC EDGAR. The tone is scored automatically from the headline and can be wrong.

Score changes in the last 12 months

Every published rating and change, logged when it was published (EU Market Abuse Regulation).

Show the log: 4 entries
DateEventBalancedGrowth · IncomeWarningsPrice at publication
Rating change 9/10 10 · — — Available with Invest Pro
Rating change 9/10 9 · — — Available with Invest Pro
Rating change 9/10 10 · — — Available with Invest Pro
First rating 9/10 9 · — — Available with Invest Pro

Ratings are rules-based descriptions, valid until the next scoring run (about 06:20 and 21:50 UTC) and the same for every visitor.